The Gates Story Got Me Thinking About Our Industry

So let’s just get this out of the way. It’s wrong for police to abuse, be big­goted, racist or to racially profie.

And let’s get this out of the way too. It’s wrong to ver­bally abuse and attempt to humil­i­ate some­one who’s job it is to pro­tect your community.

Not that either of those things hap­pened. I don’t know, I wasn’t there. It is not the point of this post to judge them.

I’m writ­ing today about what this brings up about our indus­try. Our reliance on demo­graph­ics, which at times sim­ply amounts to pro­fil­ing for the sake of mak­ing money for our clients. Just because we’re not doing this to harm any­one does this make it OK? There are ad agen­cies that make it their busi­ness to only speak to one race or another. Usu­ally they are run and staffed by minori­ties. Does that make it OK for them to sin­gle out other minorities?

With the rise of the social web, we’re learn­ing bet­ter ways to tar­get con­sumers based on track­ing behav­ior rather then the gen­er­al­i­ties of age, sex, income and race. At Kil­gan­non, most of our clients are B to B and con­sid­ered pur­chases brands, so we’re usu­ally more con­cerned about pur­chase behav­ior and mar­ket con­di­tions than race or sex. We also use a unique plan­ning model that allows us to tar­get engage­ment. This allows us to talk to peo­ple with the right mes­sage at the right time.

With the rise of the social web, cus­tomers and poten­tial cus­tomers are telling us more about them and even opt­ing to engage with our clients. The smarter we get about con­sumers, the less we should rely on old-time demo­graph­ics and the more we can tar­get behavior.

What do you think?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
blog comments powered by Disqus